Cursor vs Cody (transitioning to Amp): Side-by-Side Comparison 2026
Cursor vs Cody (transitioning to Amp) comparison 2026. Side-by-side features, pricing & capabilities.
| Feature | Cursor | Cody (transitioning to Amp) |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI IDE | Agent |
| Starting Price | Free | $19/mo |
| Model Family | Multi-model | Multi-model |
| Context Window | Varies (up to 2M with Gemini) | Not disclosed |
| Code Completion | ✓ | ✓ |
| Chat | ✓ | ✓ |
| Inline Editing | ✓ | ✓ |
| Agentic Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-File Editing | ✓ | ✓ |
| Terminal Commands | ✓ | ✗ |
| Browser Use | ✗ | ✗ |
| Test Generation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Debugging | ✓ | ✓ |
| Refactoring | ✓ | ✓ |
| Code Review | ✓ | ✓ |
| PR Review | ✗ | ✗ |
| Documentation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Image to Code | ✓ | ✗ |
| Voice Input | ✗ | ✗ |
| App Generation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Deployment | ✗ | ✗ |
| Git Integration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Supported IDEs | Cursor (standalone VS Code fork) | VS Code, JetBrains (all), Emacs/Neovim (planned) |
| Open Source | No | Partial (extension) |
Pricing verified 2026-02-05. Cursor pricing | Cody (transitioning to Amp) pricing
Overview
Cursor is ai ide from Cursor (Anysphere). Cody (transitioning to Amp) is ai agent from Sourcegraph. Both tools are actively maintained as of 2026.
Cursor: What You Get
AI-powered code editor built on VS Code with deep AI integration for code generation, editing, and chat.
- AI autocomplete
- Chat with codebase
- Multi-file editing
- Terminal commands
- Code explanation
- Bug detection
Pricing: Free / $20/mo. 6 plans available.
Models: Claude Opus 4.1, Claude Sonnet 4/4.5, GPT-5, GPT-4.1, Gemini 2.5 Pro (2M), o1
Cody (transitioning to Amp): What You Get
Cody (transitioning to Amp) — AI Code Assistant from Sourcegraph. Codebase-Aware Chat.
- Code completions
- AI chat
- Agentic mode
- Multi-file editing
- Test generation
- Debugging
- Code review
- Git integration
Pricing: $19/mo. 2 plans available.
Models: Claude 3.5 Sonnet, DeepSeek-Coder-V2, OpenAI models, Google models, Mistral
Key Differences
- Category: Cursor is ai ide, Cody (transitioning to Amp) is ai agent.
- Free tier: Cursor has a free tier; Cody (transitioning to Amp) does not.
- Model family: Cursor uses Multi-model; Cody (transitioning to Amp) uses Multi-model.
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Cursor if you want Full-featured AI IDE for professional development. Choose Cody (transitioning to Amp) if you want Cody (transitioning to Amp) handles multi-step tasks independently. Both tools are strong options — the right choice depends on your workflow and priorities.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly insights on the best AI coding tools, tips, and tutorials.
Newsletter coming soon. Unsubscribe anytime.