Cursor vs Amp Code (by Sourcegraph): Side-by-Side Comparison 2026
Cursor vs Amp Code (by Sourcegraph) comparison 2026. Side-by-side features, pricing & capabilities.
Cursor is an AI IDE from Cursor (Anysphere) — the ai-first code editor. Amp Code (by Sourcegraph) is an AI agent from Sourcegraph — agentic coding with full codebase context.
Cursor
AI-powered code editor built on VS Code with deep AI integration for code generation, editing, and chat.
- ✓ AI autocomplete
- ✓ Chat with codebase
- ✓ Multi-file editing
- ✓ Terminal commands
- ✓ Code explanation
Free / $20/mo · 6 plans
Amp Code (by Sourcegraph)
Amp Code (formerly Sourcegraph Cody Agent) — AI coding agent from Sourcegraph. Focuses on autonomous task execution across repositories. Cody continues to exist as a separate context-aware assistant.
- ✓ Code completions
- ✓ AI chat
- ✓ Agentic mode
- ✓ Multi-file editing
- ✓ Test generation
Free · 3 plans
| Feature | Cursor | Amp Code (by Sourcegraph) |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI IDE | Agent |
| Starting Price | Free | Free |
| Model Family | Multi-model | Multi-model |
| Open Source | No | Partial (extension) |
Pricing verified Mar 20, 2026. Cursor pricing | Amp Code (by Sourcegraph) pricing
Key Differences
- Category: Cursor is an AI IDE; Amp Code (by Sourcegraph) is an AI agent.
- Starting price: Cursor starts at $20/mo; Amp Code (by Sourcegraph) starts at free / BYOK.
- Open source: Cursor: No. Amp Code (by Sourcegraph): Partial (extension).
- Bring your own key: Cursor supports BYOK; Amp Code (by Sourcegraph) does not.
- Platforms: Cursor runs on Linux, Windows, macOS; Amp Code (by Sourcegraph) runs on Desktop, Web.
- Provider: Cursor is built by Cursor (Anysphere); Amp Code (by Sourcegraph) is built by Sourcegraph.
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Cursor if you want a full-featured AI IDE for professional development. Choose Amp Code (by Sourcegraph) if you want autonomous planning and multi-file task execution. Read our full reviews to see which fits your workflow.